Dreadlock-Hating NJ Ref Is Suing For Emotional Distress, Character Defamation

Alan Maloney told Andrew Johnson to cut his dreads or forfeit, and now he’s suing.

Back in December, New Jersey high school wrestling referee, Alan Maloney, found himself in a storm of controversy. Maloney forced wrestler Andrew Johnson to cut his dreadlocks or forfeit his wrestling match.

Although Johnson came with his hair covered in a wrap and coach’s warning, Maloney, dissatisfied, ordered Johnson to cut off his dreads or face disqualification.

The Shadow League on Twitter

Telling wrestler Andrew Johnson to cut his dreads or he wouldn’t be able to compete is horrendous. It’s racism, intimidation, ignorance, disrespect, embarrassment and belittling all rolled into one ([email protected] ) A thread. https://t.co/iOg6vACYZ5

Since then, the incident was investigated and the Buena Regional Board of Education has taken the necessary precautions. One such measure was refusing to send its sports teams to any events where Maloney would be officiating.

Now it’s reported that Maloney has taken the first step towards filing a lawsuit alleging defamation of character and emotional distress.

USA TODAY HSS on Twitter

Wrestling referee Alan Maloney is claiming that he lost $100,000 and suffered emotional distress as a result of his decision to tell a Buena wrestler to cut his dreadlocks. https://t.co/zyw8Q3d0Di

In a notice sent to 12 possible defendants this month, Maloney alleges he has lost $100,000 in income. Officials say Maloney had not been scheduled to officiate since December; a referee gets about $84 to officiate a varsity match.

In his claim notice, Maloney defends his actions during the match between Johnson and an opponent from Oakcrest High Schools in Mays Landing.

Maloney claimed Johnson violated the athletic association’s rules governing hair and did not have a legally sanctioned hair covering. He added that the proper time—90 seconds—was given for Johnson to correct the problem.

Johnson’s family lawyer, Dominic Speziali, maintains that Johnson’s hair length fell within regulations and that Johnson was singled out. He also added that Maloney said Johnson needed a covering not because of the length but because his hair “wasn’t in its natural state” and referred to the dreadlocks as “braids”.

Johnson and his family have declined any interview requests as this case develops.

What people are saying

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Back to top